Recurring vs. Non-Recurring Bonuses
The first determination an underwriter makes is whether the bonus income is recurring. A recurring bonus is one that the borrower has received on a regular basis, typically annually, as part of the employer’s standard compensation plan. Examples include annual performance bonuses, profit-sharing distributions, and structured incentive payments tied to ongoing metrics. A non-recurring bonus is a one-time payment such as a signing bonus, a retention bonus paid during an acquisition, or a spot award for a specific accomplishment. Non-recurring bonuses are excluded from the qualifying income calculation because the lender cannot project their continuance. The borrower’s employment contract, offer letter, and employer verification are the primary sources for determining whether a bonus is recurring. If the borrower received a bonus two years in a row but the employer characterizes it as discretionary and not guaranteed, the lender will still generally include it as long as the pattern and employer verification support the expectation of continuance.
Averaging Methodology
Bonus income is averaged using the same two-year framework applied to other variable income types. The lender adds the bonus amounts from the two most recent calendar years and divides by 24 to calculate a monthly average. For example, if a borrower received a $15,000 bonus in 2024 and an $18,000 bonus in 2025, the two-year total is $33,000, and the monthly average is $1,375. If year-to-date information indicates the borrower has already received a bonus in the current year, the lender may factor that data point into the calculation using a weighted average. However, if the current year’s bonus has not yet been paid, the lender relies on the two prior years. The timing of bonus payments matters: if the employer pays bonuses in March for the prior year’s performance, the lender should match the bonus to the performance year, not the payment year, when evaluating trends.
Documentation and Verification Requirements
The lender requires specific documentation to verify and calculate bonus income. W-2 forms for the past two years show total compensation, but they do not typically separate bonus from base salary. The most recent pay stubs, particularly year-end stubs or stubs from shortly after bonus payment, often itemize bonus amounts. The Verification of Employment (VOE) is the critical document: the employer must confirm the bonus amounts paid in each of the past two years, describe the bonus structure (annual performance bonus, profit sharing, etc.), and state whether the borrower remains eligible and whether the program is expected to continue. If the VOE does not provide sufficient detail, the lender may require a separate employer letter or a copy of the bonus plan or employment agreement that describes the compensation structure.
Declining Bonus Trends
If bonus income has declined year over year, the lender applies the same declining income analysis used for other variable income types. The underwriter compares the two years and, if the trend is downward, will typically use the lower year’s figure rather than the average. For example, if bonuses were $30,000 in 2024 and $20,000 in 2025, the lender may use $20,000/year ($1,667/month) rather than the average of $25,000/year ($2,083/month). The borrower may provide a letter of explanation if the decline was due to a specific, non-recurring factor (such as a company-wide reduction in the bonus pool due to a one-time event), but the lender retains discretion to use the lower figure. If the current year’s bonus has already been paid and represents a recovery (e.g., $28,000 in 2026), the lender may reconsider the trend with three data points, but this treatment varies by lender.
Special Considerations for Stock-Based and Deferred Bonuses
Many employers, particularly in the technology and financial services sectors, pay bonuses partly or entirely in restricted stock units (RSUs), stock options, or deferred compensation. These forms of compensation present challenges for mortgage qualification because they are not liquid cash at the time of receipt, may be subject to vesting schedules, and carry market risk. Most lenders do not include unvested RSUs or stock options in qualifying income. However, if the borrower has a documented history of receiving and liquidating RSU or stock grants over a two-year period, and the grants are reported as income on W-2 forms and tax returns, some lenders will consider the historical pattern for averaging purposes. The borrower must demonstrate that the vesting and sale of stock compensation is a consistent, ongoing component of their earnings, not a one-time windfall.
Related topics include variable income averaging (overtime, bonus, commission), commission income mortgage guidelines, overtime income mortgage guidelines, debt-to-income ratio explained (dti), asset and reserve requirements explained, and common income mistakes that cause mortgage denials.