The Eight ATR Underwriting Factors
The ATR rule requires lenders to consider and verify the following eight factors: (1) current or reasonably expected income or assets; (2) current employment status; (3) the monthly payment on the mortgage being originated; (4) the monthly payment on any simultaneous loan secured by the same property; (5) the monthly payment for mortgage-related obligations such as property taxes, insurance, and HOA dues; (6) current debt obligations, including alimony and child support; (7) the monthly debt-to-income ratio or residual income; and (8) credit history .
The critical requirement is that lenders must use verified information, not simply borrower-stated information, for these factors. Income must be documented through tax returns, W-2s, pay stubs, or other reliable third-party sources. Employment must be verified through employer contact or documentation. Debts must be verified through credit reports and other records.
Relationship Between ATR and Qualified Mortgage (QM)
The Qualified Mortgage (QM) designation provides a legal safe harbor or rebuttable presumption that the lender has satisfied the ATR requirement. A loan that meets QM standards is presumed to comply with ATR, protecting the lender against borrower lawsuits alleging an ATR violation. This legal protection is the primary incentive for lenders to originate QM-compliant loans.
Loans that are not QM-compliant (non-QM loans) must still satisfy the ATR rule, but the lender bears the full legal risk of demonstrating compliance. Non-QM lenders typically maintain extensive documentation files to defend against potential ATR challenges. The ATR rule does not prohibit non-QM lending — it requires that lenders verify the borrower’s ability to repay regardless of whether the loan meets QM criteria .
How ATR Applies to Non-QM Loans
Non-QM lenders — those originating loans with features like interest-only payments, terms beyond 30 years, negative amortization, or points and fees exceeding QM limits — must independently demonstrate ATR compliance for each loan. This typically means applying the same verification standards as QM loans (documented income, verified employment, credit analysis) but without the automatic legal protection that QM status provides. Non-QM lending has grown significantly in recent years, serving borrowers such as self-employed individuals using bank statement documentation, foreign nationals, and borrowers with recent credit events who do not fit within QM parameters.
Borrower’s Right of Action for ATR Violations
If a lender originates a loan without making a reasonable ATR determination, the borrower has a legal right of action. The borrower can bring a claim within three years of the violation occurring. Additionally, borrowers have a permanent defense of recoupment — meaning that in a foreclosure action, the borrower can raise the ATR violation as a defense against the foreclosure at any time, even beyond the three-year statute of limitations for affirmative claims. This recoupment defense can result in the reduction of the amount owed or other remedies .
The potential for borrower lawsuits and foreclosure defenses is what makes QM compliance so important to lenders. A QM loan’s safe harbor or rebuttable presumption significantly reduces the lender’s exposure to these claims.
Related topics include qualified mortgage (qm) rules explained, trid: tila-respa integrated disclosure rules, role of fannie mae and freddie mac in mortgage lending, and mortgage regulations: a borrower’s guide.